Legal Opinion
Klinicki v. Lundgren
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 20, 1985No. TC A7810-16086/CA A20084PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The factual and legal background of this complicated litigation was succinctly set forth by Chief Judge Joseph in the Court of Appeals opinion as follows:
“In January, 1977, plaintiff Klinicki conceived the idea of engaging in the air transportation business in Berlin, West Germany. He discussed the idea with his friend, defendant Lundgren. At that time, both men were furloughed Pan American pilots stationed in West Germany. They decided to enter the air transportation business, planning to begin operations with an air taxi service and later to expand into other service» such as regularly…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Irving Trust Co. v. DeutschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Leavitt v. Leisure Sports IncorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Rogers v. SaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Chiles v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Ostrowski v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.