Goodale v. Lachowski
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The issue is whether the trial court was correct in allowing the jury to award punitive damages when the only other relief sought and received by plaintiffs was an accounting. We affirm.
For approximately 20 years, plaintiffs and defendant operated a court reporting service together. By agreement of the parties, each rendered services as a court reporter and billed his services as Goodale, Friedsam and Lachowski. Defendant received 75 percent of his collected billings,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pringle Tax Service, Inc. v. KnoblauchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Klinicki v. LundgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Klinicki v. LundgrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Blakely v. Industrial IndemnityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CloptenUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1994
- Marcoulier v. UmstedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Evergreen West Business Center, LLC v. EmmertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014