Legal Opinion

Goodale v. Lachowski

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 14, 1989No. A8702-01082; CA A47306PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The issue is whether the trial court was correct in allowing the jury to award punitive damages when the only other relief sought and received by plaintiffs was an accounting. We affirm.

For approximately 20 years, plaintiffs and defendant operated a court reporting service together. By agreement of the parties, each rendered services as a court reporter and billed his services as Goodale, Friedsam and Lachowski. Defendant received 75 percent of his collected billings,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pringle Tax Service, Inc. v. KnoblauchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. Klinicki v. LundgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Klinicki v. LundgrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Blakely v. Industrial IndemnityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CloptenUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1994
  3. Marcoulier v. UmstedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Evergreen West Business Center, LLC v. EmmertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API