Allen v. McGee
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying him any relief, claiming that the trial court failed to take into account that the effect of a judgment in a previous action had been to establish the title to certain real property in him subject only to a number of liens. We have reached the conclusion that the prior judgment did not have the effect claimed for it by the plaintiff, and that he was rightly denied any relief.
Plaintiff framed his complaint in four counts, each having reference to a piece of real property in Santa Barbara County. In the first count it is alleged…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- McGee v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Judson v. LyfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bateman v. KelloggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Hudson v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Kaiser v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Powers v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Clark v. CuinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.