Hudson v. West
California Supreme Court
Hughes, Maul & Fogerty and Geoffrey A Hughes for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
By this action plaintiffs sought to confirm their right to take four inches of water from Grub Ravine during the irrigation season and to enjoin defendants’ interference with that right. Defendants denied plaintiffs’ right to take water, alleged their own prescriptive right to take all the water flowing through their land in Grub Ravine, and prayed that their own right be quieted against the claims of plaintiffs. The trial court entered judgment providing that plaintiffs take nothing by their action, that defendants are the owners of all waters flowing on or upon their land, and that *827defendant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Matteson v. WagonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Helvey v. SaxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Finley v. Yuba County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Kunza v. GaskellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.