Legal Opinion

Starlock Mfg. Co. v. Kublanow

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 8, 1939No. Nos. 6785-6788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.. The circumstances 6f this case incline us to agree with what Professor Vaughan says in his provocative book, Economics of Our Patent System (1925): “The -very large number of patents granted by the United States to its own citizens and foreigners is undoubtedly one of the sources of litigation. This country grants more patents than any other; in fact,' it has granted up to date approximately one-third of all the patents conferred by all nations; Thousands of patents overlap each other to a considerable extent. They may- describe means which vary only slightly in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re EllisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Angell v. AngellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  3. Bloom v. LockeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  4. Farmer v. PritchardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  5. Hill v. HillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Radtke Patents Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Lanova Corp. v. National Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. Lorenz v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API