Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Locke

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 5, 1934No. 3233; 3234PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeaiiaM, Presiding Judge

On May 19, 1922, Bloom presented his application to the Patent Office for a patent upon apparatus for chassis lubrication, which went to patent on June 14, 1927.

On July 31, 1925, the appellees, Sylvanus D. Locke and Charles P. Dosch, filed their joint application for patent on a similar invention. On May 16, 1928, an interference, No. 56841, was declared by the office between said application and the Bloom patent, which interference was redeclared on October 4, 1929, to include a reissue application of Frederick H. Gleason, which application was filed December 5, 1928, on patent No. 1629453,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Johnson Bros. Boat Works v. ConradNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Starlock Mfg. Co. v. KublanowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API