Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Pritchard

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1933No. 3152PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

An interference was declared by the United States Patent Office between the application for patent, Serial No. 37093, filed by the appellant, Albert J. Farmer, on June 15,1925, and the application of William S. Pritchard, the appellee, Serial No. 80686, filed January 11, 1926, for a similar invention.

The subject matter of the interference was set forth in three counts which are as follows:

1. In a valve, a chamber connected to a part to be lubricated and to a lubricant supply, an element reciprocably mounted in said chamber for expelling a previous^ measured quantity of lubricant from said…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Starlock Mfg. Co. v. KublanowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  4. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API