Legal Opinion
Lanova Corp. v. National Supply Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 22, 1940No. 7341PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The court below held that the defendant’s engine did not infringe Franz Lang’s United States Patent No. 1,803,262 issued in April, 1931, upon an application filed in March, 1926. The Lang patent here in issue discloses a compression ignition oil engine. The plaintiffs, respectively, are the owners of the legal title to the Lang patent and the exclusive licensee thereunder and have appealed.
We have appended to this opinion simplified drawings showing the engine of the patent in suit and the defendant’s engine. An examination of the first of these shows a compression space…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Jacobs v. Iodent Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
- Fried. Krupp Aktien-Gesellschaft v. Midvale Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. National Milling Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Ordnance Gauge Company v. Jacquard Knitting MacHine Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Tinnerman Products, Inc. v. George K. Garrett Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- American Cyanamid Co. v. Hercules Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.