Legal Opinion
Angell v. Angell
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 2, 1934No. 3276; No. 3277PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLenRoot, Judge
These are cross-appeals in an interference proceeding involving-four counts. The interference is between an application of the party Morin, filed December 7, 1928, and the application of the party Angelí, filed December 10, 1928. Morin is, therefore, the senior party, and the burden was upon Angelí to establish priority' of invention by a preponderance of evidence.
The claim corresponding to count 1 is for an apparatus, and the claims corresponding to counts 2, 3, and 4 are process claims.
The Board of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences, awarding priority of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Daley v. TrubeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- Starlock Mfg. Co. v. KublanowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999