Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Ellis

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 25, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2639PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

This is an áppeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals'affirming that of the examiner refusing to allow elaims .17 to 21, inclusive (claims 7, 8, 9, 10 being allowed), relating to the distillation and purifying of oil in an internal combustion engine. Claims 17 and 18 are illustrative and follow:

“17. In combination with an internal-combustion engine having a crankcase, and an exhaust conduit; a distilling vessel associated with said exhaust conduit so as to be heated thereby; means for supplying lubricating oil from the crankcase of said engine to said distilling…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re AustinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. International Cellucotton Products Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  2. Avery v. ChaseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  3. Nitz v. EhrenreichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  4. Starlock Mfg. Co. v. KublanowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  5. Jorgensen v. KingslandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API