Legal Opinion
Danforth v. City of Yankton
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1946No. File No. 8898PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
This action was instituted by Charles Irving Danforth under the Declaratory Judgment Act (SDC 37.01) against the City of Yankton, the mayor, auditor, treasurer and the commissioners of the city for the purpose of determining the validity and effect of the provisions of Chapter 118, Laws 1945. There was a trial on the merits in the circuit court of Yankton county which resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and from such judgment defendants have appealed.
The statute referred to is entitled “An Act to Authorize the Governing Bodies of Certain Public Corporations, To Purchase, Acquire,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Cook v. RichardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- County Board of Education for Unorganized Territory v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Arens v. Village of RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Boever v. South Dakota Board of AccountancySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Benson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.