Legal Opinion
Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 15, 1940No. 32,437PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment. The complaint alleges the enactment of Ex. Sess. L. 1936, c. 2 (3 Mason Minn. St. 1938 Supp. c. 23AA), establishing a state unemployment compensation system conforming to the criteria of the federal social security act (49 St. 620, 42 USCA, c. 7) and the amendment of the 1936 state law by L. 1939, c. 443. The provisions of the statutes shall be stated only so far as here pertinent.
The 1936 statute establishing the state unemployment compensation system declares that it was enacted under the police power of the state “for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Electric Bond & Share Co. v. Securities & Exchange Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. HavelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Anderson v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
- McElhone v. GerorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Onvoy, Inc. v. Allete, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.