Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment (ORS 28.010 to ORS 28.160) construing the provisions of ORS ch 332, particularly ORS 332.285. The trial court construed these provisions in favor of defendants and entered a judgment to that effect. Plaintiffs have appealed.
The facts disclose that defendant, School District No. 9, Coos County, Oregon, is a school district of the first class. This defendant commenced construction of and has completed and put in use a school building, Millicoma Junior High School, which cost in excess of $2000.
In the construction of this school building defendant did…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Fairfax v. ShanklinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Edmiston v. KupsenelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Oregon Creamery Manufacturers Ass'n v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Chilcutt v. ThatchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Harris v. Cassia CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Kellas v. Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 2006
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.