Legal Opinion

Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1965PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment (ORS 28.010 to ORS 28.160) construing the provisions of ORS ch 332, particularly ORS 332.285. The trial court construed these provisions in favor of defendants and entered a judgment to that effect. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The facts disclose that defendant, School District No. 9, Coos County, Oregon, is a school district of the first class. This defendant commenced construction of and has completed and put in use a school building, Millicoma Junior High School, which cost in excess of $2000.

In the construction of this school building defendant did…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Fairfax v. ShanklinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  2. State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Edmiston v. KupsenelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  4. Oregon Creamery Manufacturers Ass'n v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Chilcutt v. ThatchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Harris v. Cassia CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kellas v. Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 2006

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API