State ex rel. La Follette v. Dammann
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The principal question to be determined is whether the complaint states a cause of action. Upon a general demurrer the allegations of the complaint, which are not mere conclusions of law, must be considered as true. State ex rel. Duesing v. Lechner, 187 Wis. 405, 204 N. W. 478; Fulton v. State Annuity & Inv. Board, 204 Wis. 355, 236 N. W. 120; Gumz v. United States F. & G. Co. 209 Wis. 408, 245 N. W. 82; United Artists Corp. v. Odeon Building, Inc., 212 Wis. 150, 248 N. W. 784.
Whether the complaint states a cause of action for declaratory relief under sec. 269.56, Stats. (Uniform Declaratory…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Miller v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Miller v. CurrieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Garden City News v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Lynch v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Madison v. Town of FitchburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.