Legal Opinion
Concord General Mutual Insurance v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 4, 1994No. 92-148PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
Carl and Jeanne Mitchell, defendants in the declaratory judgment action below, appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Flynn, J.). On appeal, the Mitchells argue that the trial court erred in holding that they could not “stack” underinsured motorist coverage under an automobile policy issued to them by the plaintiff, Concord General Mutual Insurance Company (Concord General). Further, they argue that the trial court erred in allowing Concord General to “offset” its underinsured motorist coverage with all monies paid by the tortfeasor’s insurance company. We affirm.
On July 27, 1989, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Niedzielski v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Gelinas v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Raudonis v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Cacavas v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- High Country Associates v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Great American Dining, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Deyette v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Hoepp v. State Farm InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Pro Con Construction, Inc. v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.