Legal Opinion

Cacavas v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1986No. 85-381PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

In this appeal from the Trial Court’s (Dalianis, J.) granting of the defendant’s motion to dismiss, the plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to “stack” the uninsured motorist benefits for two vehicles that are insured by the defendant under a single policy. We agree, and accordingly reverse and remand.

In March 1982, the plaintiff and several other pedestrians were injured in an automobile accident in Manchester when they were struck by a motorist who had left the roadway and traveled down the sidewalk. The plaintiff was seriously injured and claimed $200,000 in damages. The aggregate total…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Federated American Insurance v. RaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Grimes v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. Taft v. CerwonkaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  5. Andrews v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FerranteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  3. Haley v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  4. Hudson v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  5. Gelinas v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API