Legal Opinion
Pro Con Construction, Inc. v. Acadia Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 5, 2002No. 2000-422PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, Acadia Insurance Company (Acadia), appeals a Superior Court (Manias, J.) order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Pro Con Construction, Inc. (Pro Con). We reverse and remand.
In 1993, Oracle Corporation hired Pro Con to manage the construction of its facility in Nashua. Pro Con hired several subcontractors for the project, including Decorative Concepts, an interior painting contractor. During the project, Decorative Concepts carried a commercial general liability policy issued by Acadia that contained an additional insured endorsement. This endorsement provides:
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Merchants Insurance Co. of New Hampshire, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Shell Oil Co. v. AC & S, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Akerley v. Hartford Insurance GroupSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Deyette v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Concord General Mutual Insurance v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Great American Dining, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Philbrick v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Peerless Insurance v. Vermont Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Mikula v. Miller Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.