Legal Opinion
Niedzielski v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 23, 1991No. 89-560PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The plaintiffs Mary Doe and Jane Doe appeal a declaratory judgment entered by the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) in favor of the defendant, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul), the provider of professional liability insurance to Eugene Niedzielski, D.D.S., the defendant in the underlying tort case. Dr. Niedzielski brought the original declaratory judgment action claiming insurance coverage for events that occurred on August 28,1981, at his dental office. Jane Doe and her mother, Mary, joined as plaintiffs in that action. The trial court found that St. Paul was not obligated to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Public Service Mutual Insurance v. GoldfarbNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Harad, Charles A. And the Home Insurance Company v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Catania, Francis JCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Zipkin v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Curtis Ambulance of Florida, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Shawnee, Kansas, and Medevac Midamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Princeton Insurance v. ChunmuangSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Roe v. Federal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- New Mexico Physicians Mutual Liability Co. v. LaMureNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Lindheimer v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. JacobsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.