Legal Opinion

Gelinas v. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 9, 1988No. 87-053PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

In this appeal from a ruling by the Superior Court (Dalianis, J.), we are asked to determine whether an insurance company should be held liable to the assignee of a policyholder for a jury verdict in excess of the coverage. We affirm the decision in favor of the defendant. The case before us arises from the underlying tort action which was the subject of our decision in Gelinas v. Mackey, 123 N.H. 690, 465 A.2d 498 (1983), in which we upheld a jury award of $200,000 for injuries received by Mr. Gelinas. In the case now before us, the plaintiff attempts to require the insurance company to pay…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lawton v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Douglas v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
  4. Dumas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  5. Hydraform Products Corp. v. American Steel & Aluminum Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Russell v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  3. Parkhurst v. GibsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. Allen v. Dover Co-Recreational Softball LeagueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. Raudonis v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API