Fritz v. Frost
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Appellant was the owner of a tract of land in Los Angeles County which he desired to sell for $225,000. It was subject to the lien of a local improvement assessment in the sum of $2,870.48. Respondent and W. Y. Young, his assignor, were real estate brokers duly licensed by the state of California.
Early in February, 1926, appellant came in contact with respondent and expressed a desire to sell his property. He made a verbal promise to respondent to pay him five per cent commission on the first $50,000 of the selling price and two and one-half per cent commission on the balance in the event of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Muir v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Carrington v. SmithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Johnson v. KrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Staub v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Sanstrum v. GonserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Devereux v. SirkusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Holloway v. ThieleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Martin v. ChernabaeffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.