Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Frost

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1931No. Docket No. 854PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Appellant was the owner of a tract of land in Los Angeles County which he desired to sell for $225,000. It was subject to the lien of a local improvement assessment in the sum of $2,870.48. Respondent and W. Y. Young, his assignor, were real estate brokers duly licensed by the state of California.

Early in February, 1926, appellant came in contact with respondent and expressed a desire to sell his property. He made a verbal promise to respondent to pay him five per cent commission on the first $50,000 of the selling price and two and one-half per cent commission on the balance in the event of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Muir v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Carrington v. SmithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Johnson v. KrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Staub v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Sanstrum v. GonserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Devereux v. SirkusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Holloway v. ThieleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Martin v. ChernabaeffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API