Legal Opinion

Staub v. Muller

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1936No. Sac. Nos. 5023, 5024 (Consolidated Cases)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

These two actions were brought by plaintiff to recover for damage to land and crops caused by the flooding of her property, in the one case during the years 1929 and 1930, in the other during the year 1931. The causes were consolidated for trial, but separate judgments were entered against defendant, from which he has appealed.

Plaintiff and defendant owned adjoining forty-acre farming tracts in Sutter County crossed by a drainage ditch or natural swale which successfully drained plaintiff’s land. Said land, during the period here involved, was devoted to the raising of alfalfa.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Foley v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lowe v. Yolo Cty. Consol. Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Foster v. KeatingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Allard v. Church of ScientologyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Garten v. GartenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API