Legal Opinion

Devereux v. Sirkus

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1951No. Civ. 18064PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiffs sued Jack Sirkus and wife, Harold Senter and wife, and George W. Olson and wife, to recover the amount of-two broker’s commissions claimed to have been earned in negotiating an exchange of real estate for defendants. . The demurrers of defendants Sirkus and Senter were sustained without leave to amend and judgment was entered in their favor. No judgment has been rendered as to defendants. Olson. Plaintiffs-appeal.-

The complaint contains three causes of action. It is alleged in the first cause of action that the defendants employed plaintiffs “to. obtain a purchaser- or person with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Jauman v. McCusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Jennings v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Fritz v. FrostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Schantz v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Ira Garson Realty Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Sanstrum v. GonserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Deicher v. CorkeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API