Devereux v. Sirkus
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
Plaintiffs sued Jack Sirkus and wife, Harold Senter and wife, and George W. Olson and wife, to recover the amount of-two broker’s commissions claimed to have been earned in negotiating an exchange of real estate for defendants. . The demurrers of defendants Sirkus and Senter were sustained without leave to amend and judgment was entered in their favor. No judgment has been rendered as to defendants. Olson. Plaintiffs-appeal.-
The complaint contains three causes of action. It is alleged in the first cause of action that the defendants employed plaintiffs “to. obtain a purchaser- or person with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Jauman v. McCusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Jennings v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Fritz v. FrostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Schantz v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Ira Garson Realty Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Sanstrum v. GonserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Deicher v. CorkeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.