Legal Opinion

Price-Orem Investment Co. v. Rollins, Brown & Gunnell, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1986No. 19096PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Plaintiff Price-Orem Investment Company (“Price-Orem”) appeals from the district court’s order dismissing its suit on the ground that it failed to join an indispensable party. Price-Orem also asserts that the trial court erred in granting a new trial to defendant Rollins, Brown and Gunnell, Inc. (“Rollins, Brown”), after the jury returned a verdict finding defendant liable for negligently surveying a building site in plaintiff’s shopping center. We reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the action and remand for trial.

In July of 1973, John Price Associates, Inc. (“JPA”), a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Cheney v. RuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Jardine v. Brunswick CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Christenson v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Landes v. Capital City BankUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Heslop v. Bank of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1992

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API