Legal Opinion

Heslop v. Bank of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1992No. 900532PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Defendant Bank of Utah appeals from a jury verdict awarding Ivan J. Heslop damages for wrongful termination and from the trial court’s refusal to grant a new trial. Plaintiff Heslop cross-appeals the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on consequential damages arising from his termination, including attorney fees, and its decision granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict dismissing plaintiff's public policy claims. We affirm the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for a new trial. We reverse for failure to allow the jury to award Heslop…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. City of Midland v. O'BRYANTTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. SaundersUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ryan v. Dan's Food Stores, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Billings v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API