Legal Opinion
Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 2002No. 20010298PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSON, Justice:
T1 Garrett Prince ("Prince") appeals an order granting partial summary judgment to Bear River Mutual Insurance Company ("Bear River") and asks us to hold that Bear River breached the insurance policy that afforded Prince personal injury protection ("PIP") coverage. Further, Prince appeals the trial court's award of $450 in attorney fees. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
T2 The matters on appeal arose out of Prince's allegations that Bear River improperly refused to pay PIP benefits under an insurance policy to Prince for injuries Prince suffered in an automobile accident. At all times…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Banner Bank v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Oman v. Davis School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Zolman v. Pinnacol AssuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Reighard v. YatesUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Saleh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.