Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Rucker

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1963No. 9646PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff A. H. Cheney, assignee of certain accounts of Real Estate Exchange, Inc., sued to recover for broker’s services the latter had rendered defendants in arranging a trade of their motel property for a dairy farm. The trial court rejected plaintiff’s claim that he was entitled to 5% on the $95,000 value of the property, to-talling $4,750, as provided by an earnest money agreement, but granted him judgment for $3,500 based upon a subsequent agreement. Defendants’ attorney filed a notice of appeal, which was later dismissed. We are concerned only with plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Taylor v. E. M. Royle Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Allen v. Rose Park PharmacyUtah Supreme Court · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Price-Orem Investment Co. v. Rollins, Brown & Gunnell, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Glenn v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 2009

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API