Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Adver. of Charlotte Ltd.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
*40 Where the trial court did not lack subject matter jurisdiction, we affirm. However, where the trial court's findings and conclusions regarding the compensable property *153 interests taken are unsupported by the evidence and contrary to law, we reverse.
On 6 December 2011, the North Carolina Department of Transportation ("plaintiff-DOT") filed a civil action in Mecklenburg County Superior Court and an acknowledgment of taking pursuant to a resolution of plaintiff-DOT authorizing the appropriation of defendant's property for the construction of a highway project. When the parties…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Cartin v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Carolina Beach Fishing Pier, Inc. v. Town of Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017