Legal Opinion

Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Adver. of Charlotte Ltd.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 2016No. 15-589PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*40 Where the trial court did not lack subject matter jurisdiction, we affirm. However, where the trial court's findings and conclusions regarding the compensable property *153 interests taken are unsupported by the evidence and contrary to law, we reverse.

On 6 December 2011, the North Carolina Department of Transportation ("plaintiff-DOT") filed a civil action in Mecklenburg County Superior Court and an acknowledgment of taking pursuant to a resolution of plaintiff-DOT authorizing the appropriation of defendant's property for the construction of a highway project. When the parties…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cartin v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Carolina Beach Fishing Pier, Inc. v. Town of Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  2. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Advert. of Charlotte Ltd. P'shipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API