Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Conrad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1965No. 378PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

The principal assignments of error relate to the competency of certain evidence.

Defendants’ 5.3 acre tract, before the taking of the 2.12 acre right of way, was triangular in shape and the topography was irregular with undeveloped woodland on the south side which dropped off sharply to a bottom area at a creek on the north side. At the eastern boundary a small area around an abandoned house site had previously been cleared. The right of way runs northeast and southwest over and across the tract, leaving only .15 of an acre north of the right of way, and 3.18 acres south of the right of way.

W.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Campbell v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. HeldermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. DeGregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API