Legal Opinion

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 19, 1945No. C. D. 949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. v. United, States, 10 Cust. Ct. 313, C. D. 773, affirmed in same v. same, 32 C. C. P. A. 56, C. A. D. 285, held dogfish-liver oil to be a drug, advanced in value or condition, paragraph 34 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1001, par. 34), dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem, as assessed by the collector, and not a crude drug entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1201, par. 1669), as the importer had claimed. The merchandise was also held to be subject to an internal revenue tax of 1%…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Atlantic Coast Fisheries Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  4. Judson Sheldon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Protests 917421-G of EmyUnited States Customs Court · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Newman Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Thompson Hayward Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  4. U. S. Vitamin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API