Legal Opinion

Thompson Hayward Chemical Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 20, 1951No. C. D. 1350PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This action involves the classification of certain merchandise invoiced as pyretosin No. 18, a pyrethrum extract. It was in the form of a liquid. The collector assessed duty thereon at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as a nonenumerated manufactured article. The plaintiff' claims that the merchandise is dutiable at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 34, as a natural and uncompounded drug, advanced, or as pyrethrum flowers, natural and uncompounded, advanced, at the same rate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. G. D. Searle & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. United States v. SteverSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Atlantic Coast Fisheries Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Selig Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API