Thompson Hayward Chemical Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Judge:
This action involves the classification of certain merchandise invoiced as pyretosin No. 18, a pyrethrum extract. It was in the form of a liquid. The collector assessed duty thereon at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as a nonenumerated manufactured article. The plaintiff' claims that the merchandise is dutiable at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 34, as a natural and uncompounded drug, advanced, or as pyrethrum flowers, natural and uncompounded, advanced, at the same rate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
- United States v. SteverSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
- Atlantic Coast Fisheries Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Selig Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952