Legal Opinion

Newman Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 28, 1966No. C.D. 2739PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, consists of pneumatic or inflatable rubber boats with motor mounts, but no motors, imported from Japan in 1962 and 1963.1 They were assessed with duty at 12% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1537(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Protocol of Terms of Accession by Japan to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 53865 and T.D. 53877, as manufactures wholly or in chief value of gutta percha or india rubber, not specially provided for. It is claimed that they are properly dutiable at 5…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. John S. Connor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Carlowitz v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  5. Thayer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Hudson Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Newman Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Allen Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Kahrs Int'l, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API