Legal Opinion

U. S. Vitamin Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 16, 1954No. C. D. 1664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

Plaintiff, a manufacturer of pharmaceuticals, imported from Argentina certain vitamin-containing beef liver extract in dried powdered form. Tbe product was classified by the collector under paragraph 34 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, as a natural and uncompounded drug, advanced in value or condition, dutiable at the rate of 5 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims the merchandise should be held free of duty under paragraph 1669 of the tariff act as a crude drug.

At the trial, the record in United States v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. R. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API