Legal Opinion
Holmes v. PHI Service Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 7, 2006No. Civil Action 05-2023 (RBW)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Margaret Holmes, brings this action alleging sex discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (2000) (“Title VII”) against defendant PHI Service Co. Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 28-46. Count I of the complaint alleges that the plaintiff was treated differently than other employees on account of her gender, id. ¶¶ 28-35, while Count II of the complaint alleges that the plaintiff was disciplined and ultimately terminated in retaliation for bringing an administrative action…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Cruz-Packer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Tucker v. Howard University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Giardino v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.