Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Howard University Hospital
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 2011No. Civil Action 10-756 (RBW)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Bridgett Tucker (“Tucker”) and Elizabeth Onyilofor (“Onyilofor”), bring this action against the defendant, Howard University Hospital (“Howard”), alleging that they were sexually harassed in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (2006), and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C.Code § 2-1401.01 (2007). The plaintiffs also bring a breach of contract claim against the defendant alleging violations of their employment contracts. Compl. ¶¶ 25, 26. 1 The…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Congress v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.