Legal Opinion
Giardino v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 12, 2008No. Civil Action No. 06-469(JMF)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action, in part, against the District of Columbia under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (the “federal employment statutes”), and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C.Code § 2-1401.01 et seq. The viability of those claims are before the Court as part of the defendants’ challenges under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(l) and D.C.Code § 12-309.
I. Right-to-Sue Letters
A. Background
The defendants previously moved for dismissal based on the plaintiffs’ failure to obtain…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Harris v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Kenneth M. Brown, Riggie A. Lott and All Other Inmates That Have Been Subject to the Conditions in the Adjustment Unit v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Pitts v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- JAIYEOLA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- McGee v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Owens v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Mpoy v. FentyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.