Legal Opinion

Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1984No. 83-1951PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

The first issue presented for review in this appeal is whether the appellee properly can stack the uninsured/underinsured motorist coverages contained in her family’s auto insurance policy. This issue is readily resolved by reference to our recent holding in Auto-Owners Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lewis (1984), 10 Ohio St. 3d 156, in which we stated at paragraph one of the syllabus:

“Where an insured has paid separate premiums in a single policy providing several vehicles with uninsured motorist coverage, the insured is entitled to recover under the uninsured motorist provisions of the policy an amount…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buckeye Union Insurance v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Faruque v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Niswonger v. Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance Co. of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. James v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kaun v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API