Dues v. Hodge
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
The principal issue before us today is whether the anti-stacking language in the uninsured motorist provision of the automobile insurance policy before us meets the applicable requirements to prevent stacking of coverage.
R.C. 3937.18(G) provides:
“Any automobile liability or motor vehicle liability policy of insurance that includes coverages offered under division (A) of this section may include terms and conditions that preclude stacking of such coverages.”
An insurance company may, pursuant to R.C. 3937.18(G), preclude the stacking of uninsured motorist coverage. The antistacking provision,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Sexton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by42 opinions
- Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Tomlinson v. SkolnikOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Wood v. ShepardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State Farm Automobile Insurance v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1991
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.