Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Allstate Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1996No. 95-269PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

We are asked to decide whether Mrs. Schaefer’s personal injury claim and Mr. Schaefer’s loss of consortium claim share a single per person limit of uninsured motorist coverage, or whether they each have available to them a separate per person limit to provide compensation for their *555own claims. In answering this question, we must determine the validity, in light of recent case law, of an automobile insurance policy provision which limits recovery for all causes of action arising out of bodily injuries sustained by one person to a single per person limit. For the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Martin v. Midwestern Group InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Moore v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Holliman v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Landis v. Grange Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API