Legal Opinion

Newman v. Hoholik

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1984No. Docket 72320PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order of summary judgment entered in favor of defendants James A. and Patricia A. Hoholik doing business as The Teddy Bear (defendants).

On June 10, 1980, Rosetta Newman filed this dramshop action against defendants on behalf of plaintiff John Everett Newman, a minor. In his complaint, plaintiff alleged that defendants unlawfully served intoxicating liquor to plaintiff’s father, John B. Newman, and, as a result, plaintiff’s father was involved in an automobile accident. Plaintiff sought damages for economic loss and loss of his father’s companionship and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Putney v. HaskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Scholten v. RhoadesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Putney v. HaskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Dickerson v. HeideMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burke v. Angies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Gardner v. StodgelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Brannstrom v. TippmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Luberski v. NorthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Riley v. RichardsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API