Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Stodgel
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 9, 1989No. Docket 103301PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a dramshop action, MCL 436.22; MSA 18.993, in which plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s orders granting defendants’ motions for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8), on the basis that plaintiff failed to "name and retain” the alleged intoxicated person. MCL 436.22(5); MSA 18.993(5). We affirm.
On March 5, 1984, while driving in Waterford Township, Emma Jean Frisch (decedent) caused her vehicle to cross the center line and collide with another car. Both drivers (Frisch and James Monforton) were killed. Decedent’s blood alcohol level was determined to be 0.22…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Browder v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Salas v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Millross v. Plum Hollow Golf ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- Putney v. HaskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Scholten v. RhoadesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Petroleum Equipment, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- ABB Paint Finishing, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Green v. SHELL OIL COMPANYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- ABB Paint Finishing, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- City of Detroit v. Triple-A Venture LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.