Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Heide

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1976No. (Docket 25536PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. J. Kaufman, J.

Defendants appeal, by leave granted, from a denial by the Berrien County Circuit Court of their motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs, GCR 1963, 117.2(1).

Plaintiffs commenced this action under the dramshop act, MCLA 436.22; MSA 18.993, to recover damages for the death of their son, John Dickerson. The complaint alleged that on or about March 17, 1973, defendant tavern owners sold or furnished alcoholic beverages to one Terry Knepple when he was intoxicated in violation of MCLA 436.29; MSA 18.1000. Plaintiffs’ son was killed when riding in Knepple’s car that evening when Knepple drove…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scholten v. RhoadesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Board of Education of Oakland Schools v. Superintendent of Public InstructionMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Podbielski v. Argyle Bowl, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Eddy v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Salas v. ClementsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. McDowellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Burke v. Angies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Putney v. GibsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Schutz v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Newman v. HoholikMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API