Scholten v. Rhoades
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Does the "name and retain” provision of. the 1972 amendment to the dramshop act 1 mandate that in an action brought by a father for the medical expenses of his minor son, allegedly incurred by reason of being served intoxicants, the son must be joined as a party defendant? This issue of first impression arises by leave granted on the following facts.
Plaintiff Donald R. Scholten was struck and injured on September 9, 1972, by a motorcycle operated by Rodney Allen Rhoades as Scholten walked across a street in Kalamazoo County. He and his father, Robert Scholten, commenced this action against…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Attorney General v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- LaBlue v. SpeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. BuckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Kangas v. SuchorskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Soap & Detergent Ass'n v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- King v. Director of the Midland County Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Grasser v. FlemingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- LaGuire v. KainMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Burke v. Angies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.