Legal Opinion

Scholten v. Rhoades

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1976No. Docket 25039PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Does the "name and retain” provision of. the 1972 amendment to the dramshop act 1 mandate that in an action brought by a father for the medical expenses of his minor son, allegedly incurred by reason of being served intoxicants, the son must be joined as a party defendant? This issue of first impression arises by leave granted on the following facts.

Plaintiff Donald R. Scholten was struck and injured on September 9, 1972, by a motorcycle operated by Rodney Allen Rhoades as Scholten walked across a street in Kalamazoo County. He and his father, Robert Scholten, commenced this action against…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Attorney General v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. LaBlue v. SpeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. BuckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Kangas v. SuchorskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Soap & Detergent Ass'n v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. King v. Director of the Midland County Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Grasser v. FlemingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. LaGuire v. KainMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Burke v. Angies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API