Legal Opinion

Luberski v. North

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1986No. Docket 83427PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeasley, P.J.

On May 13, 1981, plaintiff, Rose E. Luberski, brought suit for damages against defendants Carmen North and Sheila Thorne, doing business as Adams Corner, and Ohio Casualty Insurance Company under the Michigan dramshop statute. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(1), now MCR 2.116(C)(8), finding that plaintiff, as a matter of law, had not alleged that she had been "injured by a visibly intoxicated person” as required by the dramshop statute. Plaintiff appeals as of right.

The factual setting for this dramshop action is unusual, in that plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kangas v. SuchorskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Putney v. HaskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Scholten v. RhoadesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Palomba v. City of East DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Schutz v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spalo v. a & G ENTERPRISESMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. LaGuire v. KainMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. LaGuire v. KainMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API