Legal Opinion

Riley v. Richards

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 1985No. Docket 77442PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a judgment non obstante veredicto which vacated a jury verdict of $265,500 in favor of plaintiff in this dramshop action. We reverse and order reinstatement of the jury’s verdict.

This case arises out of an automobile collision which occurred on November 7, 1979, when plaintiffs automobile was rear-ended by a vehicle operated by defendant James Richards. Palmiter Recreation, Inc. operated a tavern known as Fort Park Bar and Recreation and is named as a defendant in this action under the Michigan dramshop act, MCL 436.22; MSA 18.993. Plaintiff alleges that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Putney v. HaskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Putney v. HaskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Newman v. HoholikMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riley v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Riley v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Riley v. RichardsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API