Legal Opinion

In Re Roose

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 12, 2003No. 02SA155PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice COATS delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Karen Roose, the respondent in the underlying attorney disciplinary proceeding, appealed from the order of the Hearing Board disbarring her and imposing costs. See People v. Roose, 44 P.3d 266 (Colo. PDJ 2002). The Board found that she had violated several provisions of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct by walking out of a depen-deney and neglect proceeding, despite being ordered by the court to remain as co-counsel, and by filing a notice of appeal and misrepresenting pertinent events to the court of appeals, after the trial court had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Attorney CSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. In Re CardwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. In Re Attorney D.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. People v. ChappellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. In Re HickoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. In Re FischerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. In re Attorney F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  3. Silva v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. In re HainesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  5. Thomas Pearson v. The People of the State of Colorado.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2022

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API