Legal Opinion

People v. Chappell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 4, 1996No. 96SA310PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and the recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent in this lawyer discipline case be disbarred. The respondent has not excepted to the panel’s action. We accept the hearing panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1977. Because the respondent did not answer the complaint, a default was entered against her, and the allegations of fact contained in the complaint were deemed admitted. C.R.C.P. 241.13(b); People v. Chappell, 783 P.2d 838, 839 (Colo.1989). Based on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MorleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. ChappellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. People v. BullockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheinbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. In Re DeRoseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. People v. JacksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API