Legal Opinion

In Re Cardwell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 24, 2002No. 01SA251PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

Jerry E. Cardwell is the respondent in this lawyer regulation proceeding. While assisting his client to plead guilty in a driving under the influence (DUI) case, Cardwell failed to disclose to the prosecutor and to the court that his client had previously been convicted of driving while ability impaired (DWAT). As a result, the trial court accepted a plea agreement, found the client guilty of the reduced offense of DWAI (first offense), and suspended the client's jail sentence. This was not a legal sentence for a defendant who has previously been convicted of DUI or DWAI. A hearing board…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Crowe v. TullSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. In re HainesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  4. In Re FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  5. A.L.L. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API