Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Attorney F.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 10, 2012No. 11SA343PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marquez

[ 1 In this attorney discipline proceeding, the respondent, Attorney F1, appeals from the decision and order of the Hearing Board imposing a sanction of public censure for *323Attorney F's knowing misrepresentation to opposing counsel. Attorney F does not challenge the Hearing Board's conclusion that she violated Rules 8.4(c) and 8.4(d) of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct by making a knowing misrepresentation. Instead, she contends that the Hearing Board erred in imposing a public censure. She argues that the Hearing Board was inclined to impose a private admonition but mistakenly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. In Re RosenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. In Re Attorney CSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. People v. SmallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. In re OlsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  2. People v. ZiankovichSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  3. People v. CarterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  4. People v. HeadSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. People v. KolhouseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API