Legal Opinion

Fausto v. Credigy Services Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 17, 2009No. C 07-05658 JWPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JOINDER

JAMES WARE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Manuel and Luz Fausto (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Defendants 1 , al leging, inter alia, violations of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692, et seq., and various state law causes of action. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants engaged in intrusive and abusive attempts to collect on an invalid debt, in violation of state and federal laws.

Presently before the Court are Defendants’ five 2 Motions for Summary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Arteaga v. Asset Acceptance, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  2. Messina v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. Varnado v. Midland Funding LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Chaconas v. JP Morgan Chase BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
  5. Marseglia v. JP Morgan Chase BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API