Legal Opinion

Marseglia v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 12, 2010No. Civil 09cv2857 JAH(RBB)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT CHASE BANK USA, NA’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC. # 7]

JOHN A. HOUSTON, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Currently pending before this Court is the motion to dismiss and to strike plaintiffs Eugene Marseglia and Sharon Lytle’s (collectively “plaintiffs”) first amended complaint filed by defendant Chase Bank USA, NA (“defendant” or “Chase”). The motion has been fully briefed by the parties. After a careful consideration of the pleadings and relevant exhibits submitted by the parties, and for the reasons set…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davis v. Hollins LawDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  2. Varnado v. Midland Funding LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. Barefield v. HSBC Holdings PLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. (PS) Conerly v. Veracity Research CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Bostwick v. SN Servicing CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API